|
02.05.2002
Irony, you may have heard,
is dead.
This is sure to come as bad news for
the small but vital number
of people who have made this form of cultural expression
into a cottage industry
of sorts, but it cannot be helped: times change, and we must
change with them or forever be consigned to the dustbin of history.
Surely no one is happy about the Death of Irony -- the
journals of serious opinion on both the right
and left are not gloating
over the demise
of The Big I, even though they never really liked it. But
facts are facts. It's been nearly 5 months now since a few dedicated
and decidedly unironic men created the conditions under which
irony sneeringly faded and died.
Of course, it helps that
irony's death was scarcely faster than its birth; for thousands
of years it was the playground of effete intellectuals and pompous
litterateurs, and its useful life as a tool of the masses was,
culturally speaking, a blink of an eye. It also helps that most
people never went much for irony in the first place; they
didn't like it, didn't trust it, thought it was a bit suspect.
Critics, opinon-makers and those whose job (granted them, certainly,
by someone who knew what they were doing) it is to safeguard
our culture generally placed irony in the same category as
satire, philosophy and intentional
gender confusion -- something to be allowed but never really
embraced.
All along, irony frustrated
us: by its
very definition it would not say what it meant. It was insincere.
It was confusing. It didn't do what we expected it to do. All
sorts of impenitent and unwelcome ideas could be wrapped in its
mantle, and we wouldn't even know it! Happily, the wise guardians
of American thought knew how to handle it. There was no need
to ban it -- we learned long ago that getting
rid of things is problematic and can backfire. Much easier
to simply declare it unfashionable. Those who worked in irony
were juvenile and immature
at best and hypocrites of the highest order at worst. Its
chief advocates were suspicious, pretentious or childish. Still,
despite these noble efforts at informing the public, it never
really quite went away.
That was then. Now, we
have a New Sincerity;
we have people
who know better than to temper their every earnest urge with
the pale cast of thought; we have learned that some things are
beyond our feeble attempts at humor and some subjects, and the
people who discuss them, must not be subject to ridicule, no
matter how subtle its tone. Dramatic irony and comedic irony
are as useless as the buggy whip, because life has enough drama,
and comedy just isn't right anymore. Arthur
Schlesinger once dared to suggest that "what we need
is a rebirth of satire, of dissent, of irreverence, of an uncompromising
insistence that phoniness is phony and platitudes are platitudinous";
but where is he today? He's dead, just like irony. And if he's
not, he might as well be.
|