|
03.26.2003
So, it's war, is it? Thank
goodness. It's been so long since we saw American servicemen
coming home in sacks, hasn't it? Too long, if you ask me. This
country has been aching for a good solid high-fatality dust-up
since the Nam. What good is a war where the enemy is too tiny
(like the invasion of Grenada), or isn't human (like the war
on drugs), or is largely imaginary (like the war on terrorism)?
It's about time we got some big, belligerent dictator to pick
on again. And no half-measures this time! We spent a lot of money
and effort pretending that Saddam Hussein was a menace to the
world and had to be done away with; it would be anti-climactic
if we didn't have plenty of American casualties this time around.
Besides, we have to use all these wizard rockets and bombs, or
they'll go bad -- or worse, they'll just sit there, and we'll
have no reason to spend lots of money on more.
The six anti-war articles
to have appeared in the American press since the prosecution
of this just and desperately needed war began have all contained
the phrase "in war, the first casualty is always truth",
and I have no intention of breaking precedent. But really, this
dandy little truism rests on a basic error: that truth was alive
to begin with. I'm afraid that truth was killed long before this
war even started. In fact, it was quietly strangled to death
in a back alled in 1998, when Richard Perle and his American
Enterprise Institute cronies first lobbied then-President Clinton
to resume hostilities with Saddam Hussein's ruined country on
the bogus grounds that it was a threat to regional stability.
Since then, the corpse of truth has not fared well; it was sodomized
by morgue attendants when the government attempted repeatedly
to link the September 2001 terror attacks to Iraq, it was subjected
to a messy botched autopsy when facetious, hypocritical talk
of a humanitarian effort to liberate the oppressed Iraqi people
began, and when all the bogus accusations of weapons of mass
destruction began, it was dropped out of its casket at the cemetary,
where it proceeded to roll down a hill and get run over by a
passing garbage truck.
Not since the Polish attacks
on the radio station at Gleiwitz have there been so many fabricated
pretexts burning up the wires of an utterly compliant press corps
as there is now. It's difficult to avoid hyperbole at a time
like this; there's been no time in recent memory when the news
media are so bursting with nonsense spoonfed to them by the authorities
or picked up from dubious sources. The war is less than two weeks
old, and already we've had the greatly exaggerated reports of
Saddam Hussein's death (followed up by grade-Z spy novel nonsense
about doubles and faked videotapes; one wonders when the Iraqis
will unveal the hologram of Saddam), the piteously oversold 'shock
and awe' campaign, false reports of suicide bombings and mass
surrenders, specious plots against foreign journalists, stories
of defections of high-level Iraqi officials that were cut from
whole cloth, innumerable 'discoveries' of chemical weapons that
turned out to be elseways, and, of course, the inimitable 'mass
uprising' that wasn't in the city of Basra. Some lies were predictive
(such as the Iraqi citizens greeting their liberators with open
arms, an event that hasn't materialized yet) and some were indicative
(a report -- originating in a right-wing Israeli paper -- of
the discovery of recently minted Russian-made missiles that was
repeated in several wire reports, despite being completely false)
and some were lies of omission (the gaping void of detail about
almost everything specific about our military actions coming
from Pentagon briefings, in marked contrast to both Iraqi briefings
and American ones prior to Gulf War I, when the whole thing became
an exercise in image management). But they're all lies, and they
just keep coming.
One wonders what the President
thinks of all this; one wonders if he thinks about it at all.
Certainly he does in an abstract way; perhaps he's even deeply
concerned about the safety and security of American troops (not
so much so that he would simply end the war, but still). The
human mind seeks restlessly for comparisons, for metaphors, for
similarities by which to make the inexplicable explicable, and
maybe we've found one here: George W. Bush, before assuming his
inheritance, was the governor of Texas. And as the governor of
Texas, he was notorious for vigorously pursuing the enactment
of the death penalty for convicts in that bloodthirsty state.
It's not hard to imagine that he thinks of Saddam Hussein in
the same way he thought of those men and women on Death Row.
They are bad people; evil people, indeed, evil to him not being
a nebulous or relative construct by a thing easily grasped and
spelled out in unambiguous detail by his religious faith. They
are people who have done terrible things, and people who have
done terrible things must be punished -- and punished with the
ultimate sanction the law can provide: a merciless death. It
scarcely matters that people protest the punishment; democracy
is a wonderful thing, but we must never let it get in the way
of doing what must be done. Let the protestors protest and the
preachers preach; we'll just stand here and pull the switch with
a look of defiant resolve. And as for the allegations that maybe
the person isn't guilty of the crime of which he or she is accused,
well...who makes the decisions around here anyway?
Diplomacy, you see, is
like the legal system. It's a bunch of worrisome paperwork that
needs to be sorted through in order to do what you have to do.
In the end, all that matters is getting the bad man where you
want him and then getting rid of him. And when he's gone, there's
plenty more just like him, plenty more undesirables who need
to be given a taste of Texas justice and American pride. And
as for the people of Iraq, as for the Muslim millions in their
far-off caves? For them Bush has the same answer as he had for
the murderous Jezebel Karla Faye Tucker, with her highfalutin
talk of regret and repentence: for them he puts his balled-up
fists to his eye, scrunches up his face, and pretends to cry,
and in that sturdy voice, that voice of everyone's bad boss,
that voice of Texas oil and New England millions, mockingly squeaks:
"Please don't kill me."
|