Hey! You! Do you live in
Philadelphia? Do you live somewhere that isn't unreasonably far
from Philadelphia? Then why not come hear me and a bunch of
other, more famous, people read at the 215 Festival? Do it!
I implore you.
ADVENTURES IN REFERRAL:
a daily assortment of random
search engine queries leading people to the Ludic Log in the past 24
hours
"Ric Flair costumes"
"racist things"
"Bjork suicide stalker book"
"Rouge the Bat nude"
"pictures of Joey Heatherton"
"dufus word origin"
"speeches for eighteenth birthday"
"Muzzies"
"ass reamers"
"teeth plaque conspiracy Metallica"
LUDIC LOG
09.22.2004
My wife, in particular, does not
like the overcoat.
My co-worker Stephen (and do I complain that he goes by 'Stephen'
rather than 'Steve', even though I think of it as a pompous
affectation? I certainly do not), who also does not like the
overcoat, does not even believe that it's an overcoat. He says
that an overcoat is something that goes over a men's suit and that is
made out of an entirely different material and with a different cut
than what I wear. What you have there, he will often say, is a
raincoat, or possibly a trenchcoat, but definitely not an
overcoat. I don't know what I'm supposed to do about that.
I don't think it's his prerogative to tell me what is and isn't an
overcoat. Besides, he is one to talk, with that ridiculous satin
baseball jacket he wears sometimes.
It is my wife, though, who does not like it most of all. She is
well aware of how much I enjoy the overcoat so she always attempts to
couch her disdain in language that suggests she is really trying to
help me out: "You don't want to wear your nice overcoat to the
party, do you?", she will say. "You're sure to spill something on
it and ruin it." Or she will say that I must spend a fortune on
dry cleaning it. Her favorite tactic is to ask if I am hot.
Aren't you hot?, she asks, and I readily admit I bring this on myself
because I wear the overcoat even in the summer. I don't think she
really cares if I am hot. She wants me to take off the overcoat
and that's that. But it's hard to come up with a response to this
because quite honestly, the overcoat does get a bit hot in August for
example. I never have anything to say to this other than that I
sweat a lot when I wear it and isn't she always telling me it would be
healthy if I lose some weight? And if she says so what I say,
sweating makes you lose weight. She just says, there are better
ways to lose weight. I know that. I know there are better
ways.
My friend Carl, too, does not like the overcoat. Or maybe this is
unfair: when you get down to cases I'm sure that he doesn't
really care about it one way or the other, but he is one of those
people who thinks if you are a man you have to always ride your man
friends. I don't understand this personally and I think you have
to be an especial hard-ass to give your friends so much trouble.
Anyway, Carl has this whole thing about how I am getting a
reputation. What kind of a reputation, is what I want to
know. I ask him this and he says, well, you know, what kind of a
person wears the same item of clothing every day? A flake, is
what kind. When your whole identity gets wrapped up in one
article of clothing, that's a sign of neurosis. It's
warped. To this I usually respond with something like oh, so
you're saying Lincoln must have been a really big flake, for wearing
that stovepipe hat.
He just fixes me with this pained look. "You're not Lincoln," he
says.
Sometimes he will expand on this and point out that besides, Lincoln
didn't really wear that hat all the time anyway. Do you think he
wore that thing in Cabinet meetings, that every time he went anywhere
he was wearing that stupid hat? It's just what he's wearing in
cartoons and drawings of him, Carl says, it's just a sort of visual
shorthand meaning 'Lincoln' and I bet he probably hardly ever wore it
at all. This sounds stupid to me and I say so, and I point out
that if he never wore the hat then how come everybody and his brother
draws him wearing it? It's around then that the whole thing goes
off onto a tangent which I am grateful for because quite frankly I'm
sick of hearing about it. There have been a few times with Carl
that I have wanted to shout "Fuck Lincoln!" But as we live in
Illinois this is probably not a good idea.
If I were honest with myself I would have to say that I have had my
doubts about the overcoat as well. I think it's very
stylish. It has that little gold link chain across the back which
I like and the plain inset thing, and the cut of it fits me
perfectly. Usually coats have sleeves that are too short for my
long arms but this one, it seems like it was made especially for
me. And there's just something about the way it looks, I don't
know. But, okay, I wear it all the time, with anything, and maybe
that's excessive although who makes the rules for things like
that? And more than that the person who I argue with the most
about the overcoat is me. I have carried on a running battle in
my head over it for nearly a year now. I am almost convinced that
I don't so much like the overcoat as I like the idea of the overcoat,
or to be more precise, the idea of myself in the overcoat. I
don't want to say that it's an attempt to be charmingly eccentric or
anything but the fact remains that I am wound up in the idea of what
the overcoat does that has little or nothing to do with the garment
itself. No one is winning this debate anytime soon, though.
I once mentioned this situation to my shrink, how I am the only one who
really seems to like the overcoat and even I have my doubts. He
asked me what I would do if my wife just asked me to stop wearing it
altogether. I said I didn't think she would ever do such a
thing. But just for the sake of the argument, he said, in a tone
of voice that struck me as more than a little impatient. Let's
say that she made you choose between her wishes and your
overcoat. You wouldn't let something as meaningless as an old
coat jeopardize your marriage, would you? I suppose in retrospect
he was attempting to construct a metaphor but if so, it was a terribly
inept one, I think. Wait a minute, I said, what kind of person is
she, then?
She's doing the same thing by making me choose, isn't she? She's
letting an old coat jeopardize our marriage. He said something
about the spirit of shared compromise or sacrifice or something, but I
had stopped listening by then. What kind of a shrink is he,
anyway? I was wondering. Who would ask a question like that?
Someday I will wake up and the overcoat will be gone. I'm sure of
it. I am not suggesting that my wife would do something like sell
it or throw it out or donate it to the Goodwill without my consent, but
I honestly believe that it will disappear someday and I will have no
control over it. I wonder what I will do then. I wonder if
I should be ready, and if, being ready, I will already have made it go
away.