|
12.02.2002
And now, another exciting
installment in the thrilling adventures of Veronica Crowe, Expounding Detective!
When we last left our intrepid girl gumshoe, she had paid a call
on the sinister Dr. Song, who spun her a yarn about the existence
of a buried treasure until Ronnie, in the course of a 72-minute
lecture about precious metal trading routes and the expansion
to western trade of modern China, saw through his little ruse.
Now, back at her office, she's barely had time to contemplate
all that she's learned, when a mysterious knock sounds at her
door...
It was just after high
noon when someone rang my office bell. Of course, I was indoors,
in my office on the 6th floor of 932 Michigan Avenue, and couldn't
see the sun overhead, but I'm not simply estimating: it so happens
that earlier, in the cab over from District Attorney Crane's
office, I had been thumbing through the Farmer's Almanac (not
Benjamin Franklin's famous tome, but an annual reference book
in the same vein, published by a small house in Boston, MA) and
noted that 'high noon' means not the approximate time at which
the sun is highest in the sky, but rather exactly and precisely
12:00PM -- which time, according to the desk clock I happened
to be glancing at in aid of finding a ruler, had just then passed
in my home city of Chicago, IL. And, just to make myself clear
and for the sake of setting the tone more precisely for my listeners,
I mean 'high noon' in the meteorological and literal sense, not
in the descriptive or metaphorical sense of the zenith of one's
professional or creative career. Of course, I may well be at
the 'high noon' of my years as a private investigator, but it
would be premature -- not to mention a tad egotistical -- to
make such a boast while I am still in the midst of the time.
I buzzed him in -- him,
of course, being a personal pronoun denoting that it was a man.
Perhaps you think I'm trying to convince you that I have some
sort of psychic powers -- precognition, perhaps, or clairvoyance,
or 'secret knowledge', as it is sometimes termed. For how else
would I have known it was a man outside my office door, before
I buzzed him in? Well, the truth, dear listener, is that
I did not. It was only after I saw the gentleman (for such it
was -- in the person of my client of the moment, Mr. Henry Q.
Jackson, a prominent local businessman and noted philanthropist)
that I was able to surmise his gender. However, when beginning
this paragraph, I thought it infelicitous to say "I buzzed
in the person who had rung the bell, whom I would soon discover
was a man, and not just any man, but in fact my client of the
moment, etc., etc.". Of course, had I done so, I would not
have actually said "etc., etc.", but replaced that
with actual things I would say. I eliminate the repetition in
the interest of time.
"Mr. Jackson,"
I said, after first saying "hello", "come in",
"have a seat", and various other social niceties of
only minimal relevance to the thrust of my narrative. "What
brings you around here?" I regretted the phrasing; while
my offices are in a well-maintained professional building, I
felt that my choice of words contained an imprecatory tone, and
could perhaps be interpreted as questioning why Mr. Jackson would
be in such "fancy digs", as the common phrase has it.
Of course, Mr. Jackson was a man of great wealth who could easily
afford (depending on the disposition of some outstanding debts,
cash to hand, and the performance of the stock market at that
time) to have bought the entire building, let alone my offices.
In fact, it occurs to me that he could, perhaps, have even taken
it in the opposite way -- as if I were asking why a man of his
fortune and standing would deign to "slum" in my (to
him) no doubt inadequate offices. However, social embarrassment
was avoided, as he seemed immediately to pick up on my intent
rather than the awkward phrasing of my greeting.
"Detective Crowe,"
he began, heedless of the fact that since I am a private investigator
and am not affiliated with the police department, 'Miss' would
be a preferable form of address to 'Detective', which, while
accurate, is better understood as an official designation of
rank in police terminology, "I was just wondering if there
were any new leads."
"Well, Mr. Jackson,"
I replied, "there you're really asking me two questions.
In a sense, I might say, there may or may not be new leads. This
is largely out of my hands; the existence or not of new leads
is contingent on the behavior of the principals in the case,
over which I have little or no control. I think, in truth, you
mean in the smaller sense -- your question may be better phrased
not as 'are there any new leads?', but as 'have you discovered
any new leads?'. As a construct, the question is perhaps..."
He interrupted me before
I could defend my argument in more precise (and, therefore, less
ambiguous) detail. "Detective, please! I need to tell you...I
received a call from my blackmailer last night."
I considered correcting
him on a definitional error -- the crime being committed against
him was, to be legally correct, extortion and not blackmail,
given the particulars of the case, which definitional error might
be of increased importance as we came closer to its resolution
-- but this was big news indeed, and I judged that it was best
to let him continue. It's a questionable choice, I realize, and
one which may later prove to have been incorrect, but for the
time being and in the absence of a rational model of projected
alternate outcomes, I stand by it. "Really! You spoke to
him at last? Tell me what happened. Be cogent."
"Well," said
Mr. Jackson nervously, or at least in a manner both vocal and
physical that I would characterize, based on my academic training
in psychology as well as practical experience in the interrogation
of witnesses, as nervousness, "he had a very odd way of
speaking. He was terse, almost truncated. He would only answer
questions 'yes' or 'no', and when he volunteered information,
it was in a very concise and abbreviated fashion. For example,
when he told me where to make the money drop, he used no traditional
subject or verb structure, but only said the place and time."
My heart sank. Not literally,
of course, although perhaps, given my posture and certain physiological
factors, it's possible. "Mr. Jackson, I think we may be
dealing with my old nemesis," and here I paused, partly
out of the dread I felt at the potentiality (if not absolute
certainty) of the villain's involvement, but, I must grudgingly
admit, with the intent of enhancing the dramatic impact of what
I was about to say, "The Exscinder."
Will Veronica Crowe, Expounding Detective
truly come face-to-face with The Exscinder? Will the crusading
damsel of discursus meet her match at the hands of the Editor
or Evil? Will Chicago's finest digressive detective find herself
crossed from the text of her own story by the blue pencil of
doom? Tune in next week...and find out!
|